There is no such thing as a right system for morality, because the value judgment of something as “right” is itself a moral assertion that depends on the moral system we adopt.
Me personally I believe that self-consistency is the only good normative ethical framework 💪
Also, disagree that empirics makes sense? Also, check out Utilitarianism: for and against — specifically J. J. Smart's section (against), cus he just spends the whole time dunking on any moral framework vs. specifically util. (You can also read his wikipedia his arguments against kantianism & util are the same.)
Also, question: if you believe there is no point in finding the "right" moral framework, why study philosophy?
Hmm, interesting take Michael! Also, nice to meet you IRL on Saturday :)
Me personally I believe that self-consistency is the only good normative ethical framework 💪
Also, disagree that empirics makes sense? Also, check out Utilitarianism: for and against — specifically J. J. Smart's section (against), cus he just spends the whole time dunking on any moral framework vs. specifically util. (You can also read his wikipedia his arguments against kantianism & util are the same.)
Also, question: if you believe there is no point in finding the "right" moral framework, why study philosophy?
Moral particularism! 🏆